Tools
RFP template for electronic shelf labels
Published by Keonex. Not affiliated with etiquetaselectronicas.com. Keonex is a manufacturer and implementer of electronic shelf labels. How we work and why we say so: methodology and transparency.
A request for proposal (RFP) for electronic shelf labels is the document you hand to every vendor so that they answer the same questions, in the same format, on the same scope. This template organises it in eight sections: requirements, radio, integration, data, service levels, batteries and end of life, price breakdown, and references.
Use it before you ask for quotes. If you already have quotes, it still helps you see what each one leaves out. Everything below can be copied into your own document. The template contains no manufacturer-specific requirements, and this site is published by Keonex (a company that sells and installs electronic shelf labels), which did not design it to fit its own product.
How to use this template without turning it into paperwork
An RFP is worth writing only if it changes what you get back. Three ideas before you fill it in.
Describe your situation, not your solution. “We need 2.9-inch labels” is a solution. “We have 40,000 SKUs, chillers at -20 °C and a POS that exposes no API” is a situation, and it lets the vendor show they can handle it. If the first feels more comfortable, you probably have not done the needs assessment in the implementation guide yet.
Ask what can be checked. Words like “robust” or “scalable” cannot be scored. “State the maximum number of labels per gateway according to the datasheet and attach it” can.
Demand the same format. Each section below ends with a response instruction: a table, a yes/no with an annex, a figure with a unit. Leave answers as free text and comparing them becomes archaeology.
The numbers you put in the price section should come from your own earlier calculation; if you do not have one, start with the total cost calculator. The other tools are listed in the tools index.
Document structure
Before the eight technical sections, the RFP needs a short operational cover:
| Block | What it contains |
|---|---|
| Purpose | One sentence: what you want to buy and for which stores |
| Context | Number of stores, floor area, format, SKUs, shelf types (ambient, chilled, frozen, displays) |
| Timeline | Deadline for questions, for offers, for the store visit, for the decision and the desired start |
| Rules | Language, response format, offer validity, confidentiality, single point of contact |
| Evaluation | Criteria and weights (see the last section) |
A practical rule: run a question round with shared answers. If one vendor asks something and only that vendor gets the reply, you end up with offers against different documents.
1. Solution requirements
Here you fix what the system must do, not how. Split it into must-have and nice-to-have; mixing them lets every vendor comply with “almost everything”.
What you provide: estimated number of labels per store and shelf type, size mix if you know it, environmental conditions (minimum temperature in chillers, humidity, direct light), whether there are variable-weight products or unit-price display, and the languages and scripts that must render on screen.
What you ask the vendor:
| Requirement | Sample question | Response format |
|---|---|---|
| Display | Available sizes and colours, resolution, viewing angle, full refresh time | Table per model with datasheet link |
| Environment | Operating temperature range per model, protection against humidity and condensation | Values with unit and source |
| Content | Long text, barcodes or QR codes, unit-of-measure symbols, strike-through price | Yes/no per element, with template screenshot |
| Platform | Template management, users and permissions, change log | Yes/no with short description |
| Price cases | Price by weight, multipacks, dual price, time-limited promotions | Yes/no with example |
Real ranges of sizes, colours and display types are described on the technology page; use them to spot unusual answers. And if your plan includes showing the previous price during sales, add an explicit requirement: the platform must keep the price history needed to prove it, in line with Directive (EU) 2019/2161 as published on EUR-Lex. Each member state transposes that directive in its own way, so check the national rule that applies to your stores.
2. Radio and coverage
This is where a weak RFP costs the most, because radio is the least visible part and the hardest to fix once the installation is done. The general overview of the sector describes it as a balance between range, speed, battery life and reliability; your RFP should force each offer to say where it sits.
What to ask:
- Technology and band. Radio protocol, frequency band, and whether it is standard or proprietary. A Bluetooth profile for electronic shelf labels exists, published by the Bluetooth SIG, but that does not mean one manufacturer’s equipment talks to another’s: get it in writing.
- Coverage survey. Who performs it, with what method (site visit, floor plans, measurements) and what it delivers: gateway map, safety margin, critical zones.
- Number and position of gateways. Proposed quantity per store, power (PoE or mains), cabling required and who installs it.
- Capacity. Maximum labels per gateway and time to complete a bulk update, with the starting assumption (for example, how many labels change at once).
- Coexistence. How it behaves next to Wi-Fi, other Bluetooth equipment, refrigeration machinery and metal displays in your store.
- Coverage guarantee. A written commitment that, if labels fall outside coverage after installation, the vendor adds gateways at no extra cost.
| Question | Expected answer |
|---|---|
| Who pays for additional gateways if the survey proves wrong? | Yes/no, with a cap if any |
| Is the survey done before the final offer? | Yes/no, and date |
| Can the status of each gateway be seen from the platform? | Yes/no, with screenshot |
If a vendor will not commit to coverage before seeing the store, that is a reasonable answer; quoting a fixed price without that visit is not. The pilot project exists partly to confirm in your own store what the survey predicted.
3. Integration with your systems
The label displays what the system sends it; the real problem is how that data travels from your ERP or POS. This section is completed with your IT team, not procurement.
Describe your environment before asking: ERP, POS and versions, where the master price lives today, how often it changes, whether prices vary by store or zone, and whether the system exposes an API, files, a database or none of those.
What to ask:
| Topic | Sample question |
|---|---|
| Input method | How are prices received: API, file, database connection, proprietary connector? Which do they propose for your system? |
| Who builds it | Who builds and maintains the integration, and at what cost, recurring or one-off? |
| Direction | One-way, or is there confirmation of what is displayed? Can it report each label’s status back to the ERP? |
| Latency | Time from approved change to visible on the label, with the measurement assumptions |
| Pairing | How are label and product linked? Scanner, code, batch. What happens with items lacking a clean barcode? |
| Failures | What happens if the connection to the ERP or gateway drops? Is the last valid price shown? |
| Environments | Is there a test environment separate from production? |
Ask for integration references with your same system, not “similar systems”. And ask what happens when your ERP is upgraded: if every version change means a paid project, that cost belongs in the offer. The principle guiding your team should be consistency between shelf and checkout, covered in till price differs from shelf price.
4. Data ownership and portability
This section tends to be left to the end of the negotiation, and it is the one that weighs most when you want to change vendor. The label platform accumulates your catalogue, your templates, the label-to-product pairings and the change history. Who owns that, and how you leave with it, must be written down.
What to ask:
- Ownership. The RFP should state that the data is yours and the vendor processes it only to provide the service.
- Location and processing. Where it is hosted (country or region), which sub-processors are involved and with what safeguards. If the platform holds personal data (system users, for example), your legal team should review the data processing agreement.
- Export. Open, complete format, including templates and pairings, not just the price catalogue. Ask whether it is a platform feature or a service on request, and what it costs.
- Exit. Deadline for handing over the data at termination, deadline for subsequent deletion, and written confirmation.
- Switching provider. If the platform is a cloud service, it may fall under the switching rules of the EU Data Act (Regulation (EU) 2023/2854, EUR-Lex), which according to a Wikipedia summary started to apply on 12 September 2025 and provides for switching charges to be abolished on 12 January 2027. Whether it affects your contract is for your legal advisers; the RFP only needs to ask the vendor to state its position.
- Security. User authentication, access logs, backups and what happens in an incident. A simple question: can they give read-only access to one of your auditors?
5. Service levels (SLA) and support
Manufacturers advertise availability but rarely say what happens when it is missed. An SLA without consequences is an intention.
| Item | What to ask |
|---|---|
| Platform availability | Monthly percentage, how it is measured and what is excluded (maintenance) |
| Support | Hours, channels, language, who handles first level |
| Priorities | Definition of critical, major and minor incident; response and resolution time for each |
| Escalation | Named contact and process for cases that stall |
| Compensation | Specific credits or penalties if missed |
| Maintenance | Update windows, advance notice, and whether they can affect price changes during opening hours |
| Replacement | Lead time to replace faulty labels and gateways, and who pays during warranty |
| Updates | Firmware and software cadence, and who decides when they are applied |
A question that helps separate proposals: what happens if the system goes down on a Saturday at ten in the morning with a promotion running? Ask for the answer to describe the procedure, with role names, not just a phone number.
6. Batteries and end of life
Labels run on batteries, and the lifetimes manufacturers quote depend on how many daily updates they assume. The technology page collects the published ranges; your RFP should ask for figures with assumptions, not general promises.
What to ask:
- Battery life per model, with the number of updates per day, the temperature and the display type it was measured with.
- Battery type and whether staff can replace it or the whole label must be swapped. Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 governs the design and waste management of batteries, including replaceability of portable batteries with its exceptions (EUR-Lex); ask the vendor to declare how it applies to each model, without assuming that it does.
- Warning. Whether the platform shows battery level and alerts in advance, and how far ahead.
- Warranty. Length of the label warranty, whether it covers the battery, and what counts as normal use.
- Replacement. Who swaps exhausted labels or batteries, within what time, and at whose cost after the warranty.
- Take-back and recycling. Who collects used equipment, with what documentary proof, and whether the cost is included.
- Platform lifespan. Until when the vendor commits to keep compatibility with the models you buy. A label that lasts ten years is of no use if the software stops supporting it after five.
To compare with leasing, a rental with replacement included changes this whole section; both schemes are explained in rent or buy.
7. Price breakdown
Ask for the offer in a fixed structure, and reject single-figure offers. If each vendor groups costs differently, you cannot tell where the differences lie.
| Item | Payment | What must be clarified |
|---|---|---|
| Labels | One-off | Unit price by size and colour, quantity, and replacement price |
| Gateways and accessories | One-off | Number, model, mounts, power |
| Platform / software | Recurring | Fee per store, per label or per user; what it includes |
| Integration | One-off / recurring | Development, testing and maintenance |
| Installation and commissioning | One-off | Who installs, days included, cabling |
| Training | One-off | Profiles, hours, material |
| Support and maintenance | Recurring | Scope and service level |
| Warranty and extension | One-off / recurring | Term, exclusions |
| Transport, logistics and take-back | One-off | Who pays, waste |
| Options | Variable | Each extra, priced separately so it can be dropped |
Also request a five-year and a ten-year scenario in the same structure, and the assumptions for price updates (revision clauses) in writing. With those figures you can feed the total cost calculator, which compares buying and renting using your own assumptions. One point to make clear in the RFP: the prices in the document are for evaluation; the contract must contain the final ones.
To see which ranges are reasonable, the vendor comparison describes who is who in the market, though it does not replace offers. Prices circulating online are not a binding reference.
8. References
A reference is worth something only if you can call it. This section must require references that are verifiable and relevant to your case.
What to ask:
- Three to five customers with a profile similar to yours (sector, size, pricing system), with a contact who agrees to talk.
- Installation date and number of stores and labels in each; ask them to distinguish pilot from roll-out.
- Which integration they use and who developed it.
- One reference that had problems and how they were solved; a vendor with none is probably not telling you everything.
- Permission to visit an installed store, if the customer agrees.
Questions for the reference call: how long it took to stabilise, what was not in the offer and appeared later, how support works in practice and whether they would buy again. Record the answers with the same script for every call.
Evaluation: how to score the answers
Set the weights before you receive offers. A starting split, to be adapted:
| Criterion | Indicative weight |
|---|---|
| Radio coverage and reliability | 20 % |
| Integration with your systems | 20 % |
| Five-year total cost | 20 % |
| Service and support | 15 % |
| Data and exit | 10 % |
| Batteries and end of life | 5 % |
| References | 10 % |
These are example weights, not a recommendation of this site. A store with heavy refrigeration will raise radio; a chain with its own ERP will raise integration. What matters is that they exist before the envelopes are opened. For finalists, the next step is the pilot, with written success criteria, before signing the roll-out.
What a legal adviser should review
The template organises technical and commercial information; it is not a contract. Before signing, have a lawyer review: the data ownership and processing clause, liability for pricing errors, exit conditions and payment terms. If you buy with public funds or grants, specific procurement rules apply that this template does not cover.
Frequently asked questions
What is an RFP for electronic shelf labels?
It is a document in which the buyer describes the store, the systems and the conditions, and asks every vendor to answer the same questions in the same format. Its main value is that it makes offers comparable; without one, quotes arrive with different structures and different scopes.
How many vendors should I invite?
Three to five is usually enough to compare without overloading the evaluation team. Include your current or preferred vendor, with the same document, so that nobody holds an information advantage.
Should I publish the scoring criteria?
Yes, as far as your procurement process allows. When the weights are known in advance, answers focus on what matters to you and the final decision is easier to justify internally.
Can I require interoperability between labels and gateways from different manufacturers?
You can ask for it, but insist on a written answer, model by model. Two products both using Bluetooth do not necessarily understand each other, because many datasheets describe proprietary protocols.
Does this template favour any manufacturer?
It contains no vendor-specific requirements. This site is published by Keonex, which also sells labels, so the sections are limited to requests for information and verifiable commitments, not a particular architecture.
Sources
- Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 concerning batteries and waste batteries (EUR-Lex)
- Regulation (EU) 2023/2854, the Data Act (EUR-Lex)
- Data Act (European Union) (Wikipedia), application dates and switching charges
- Directive (EU) 2019/2161, modernisation of EU consumer protection rules (EUR-Lex)
- Bluetooth SIG blog, Bluetooth ESL: the global standard for the electronic shelf label market (8 Feb 2023)
- Electronic shelf label (Wikipedia)
Work out the total cost of a project
A calculator with editable assumptions: labels, gateways, software, installation and a 60-month rental option. No vendor prices: you supply them.